Conclusions From an Apologetics PerspectiveThe evidence for truth of Islam is very limited. Clearly
Mohammed was a historical figure, who lived in Muslims often claim Christians corrupted the Bible, but as we have seen the historical, archaeological and manuscript evidences for preservation of the original texts in our modern day Bibles are very strong and compelling. For the Qur’an however this situation is very different. Where are the original manuscripts? What ancient writings have been preserved? How certain can anyone be that the first followers of Mohammed memorized and later recalled all texts perfectly? And compare the process of canonization of the Qur’an to the Bible. The Qur’an was canonized instantly by caliph Uthman through destroying all other manuscripts. Granted, the canonization of the New Testament endured some major struggles, but its criteria were based on apostolic authority and God’s inspiration, not the personal preference of one man. Additionally, there are no claims in Islam for miracles or fulfilled prophecies or any other facts or events that can support or prove divine inspiration or revelation. Lastly, I find it personally intriguing to read about the characteristics usually associated with Christian cults[18], like Mormonism and Jehovah Witnesses, and then apply those to Islam. The similarities are striking, like the cults, Islam claims additional revelation, rejects the Trinity, believe only they know the whole truth, distort the teachings of the Bible, require works for salvation and have a system that protects their followers from non-Muslim influences.
Table 32- 4 : Comparing the Evidences for Islam to Christianity Read on about: Christianity
and the Other World Religions
[18] See the brief discussion on Christian Cults in chapter 29.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Windmill
Ministries - Christian Apologetics - Evidences for Christianity Home - Sitemap - About Us - Support Us - Contact Us - Copyright - Resources |